Trace Your Case

Categories
Federalism - History and Typologies

State of Karnataka v. Union of India, AIR 1977 SC 69

ISSUE:

Whether the suit under Art.131 is maintainable?

Whether the notification issued by the Central Government is ultra vires the power of the government under s.3 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952?

If the same is within the ambit of s.3 and whether s.3 is unconstitutional?

RULE:

The Supreme Court's initial jurisdiction over issues affecting the scope or existence of a legal right is addressed in Article 131. Such authority shall be exercised in issues involving the Central Government and one or more States, between States, or between the Government of a State and another State. Only when an issue of law or fact arises can the Court take up a dispute under Article 131 of the Constitution. Additionally, it depends on how much of a legal right is at stake.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Federalism - History and Typologies

S. R. Bommai v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1918

ISSUE:

Is judicial review possible of the President's Proclamation made in accordance with Article 356 of the Constitution ?

If so, what does judicial review entail in this case?

What does the phrase mean in Art. 356(1)- "A situation has arisen where the Government of the State cannot be carried on in line with the provisions of this Constitution"?

RULE:

Until the Proclamation is accepted by both Houses of Parliament in accordance with clause (3) of the aforementioned article, the President is not permitted to dissolve the State's Legislative Assembly using his authority under Article 356(1). Under subclause (c) of clause (1) of the aforementioned article, he may only have the authority to suspend the Legislative Assembly.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Federalism - History and Typologies

State of West Bengal v. Union of India, AIR 1963 SC 1241

ISSUE:

Does the Parliament have the power to pass laws that would allow it to purchase land and other assets owned and vested in the State?

Whether or not India's states have sovereign power?

Whether the Act or any of its provisions exceeds the legislative authority of the Parliament?

Whether or not the plaintiff is eligible for relief?

RULE:

Article 131 grants the Supreme Court exclusive and original jurisdiction over any legal disputes that may arise between different states or between states and the Union. The court upholds the fundamental rights that are guaranteed to all Indian citizens, and any infringement on those rights may be brought before the State's High Court directly under Article 226 or the Supreme Court indirectly under Article 32 via writs granted by the Constitution.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Citizenship

Assam Public Works V. Union Of India, Writ Petition (Civ.Il) No.274 Of 2009

ISSUE:

Whether the Citizenship Act is being complied with in implementing the NRC?

RULE:

The court referred to Rule 4A of the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Card) Rules 2003 which carves out special provisions in the matter of preparation of the National Register of Indian Citizens in the State of Assam.

All persons of Indian origin who had come to Assam before the 1st of January 1966 from specified territories before the commencement of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act of 1985 are deemed to be citizens of India.

All persons who entered Assam between the 1st of January 1966 and 25th of March 1971 and who have been ordinarily resident in Assam, upon being detected as a foreigner and registering themselves in accordance with the Rules made by the Central Government have the same rights and obligations as a citizen of India except the right to be included on electoral rolls for a period of 10 years.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Citizenship

Sarbananda Sonowal v. Union Of India, Writ Petition (civil) 131 of 2000

SARBANANDA SONOWAL V. UNION OF INDIA Sarbananda Sonowal v. Union Of India, Writ Petition (civil) 131 of 2000 ISSUE: Whether the IMDT act is constitutionally valid? RULE: The provisions of the IMDT act are very stringent as compared to those of the Foreigners Act in the matters of detection and deportation of illegal migrants. The...

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Article 29- 30 Cultural and Educational Rights

T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka AIR 2003 SC 355

ISSUE:

Whether there exists a fundamental right to set up educational institutions and if so, under which provision?

To what extent government may impose regulations upon private institutions?

What is to be the unit to determine the existence of a religious or linguistic minority in relation to Article 30?

RULE:

All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.

The state shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Article 29- 30 Cultural and Educational Rights

P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharastra AIR 2005 SC 3236

ISSUE:

To what extent can professional education be treated as a matter coming under minorities’ rights under Article 30?

Whether the admission of students to minority educational institution, whether aided or unaided, can be regulated by the State Government or by the university to which the institution is affiliated?

Is there a fundamental right to set up educational institutions?

In case of private institutions, can there be government regulations and, if so, to what extent?

RULE:

All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice

The state shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Articles 25-28: Right To Freedom Of Religion:

The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt, AIR 1954 SC 282

ISSUE:

Whether the Swami of Shirur Math had a right to property under Article 19(1) (f) of the Constitution?

Whether this ‘person’ mentioned in article 25 which grants freedom of religion to every person, meant only individuals or included corporate bodies as well?

Whether Shirur Math and its followers could be considered as a ‘religious denomination or any section thereof’ to attract protection of their rights under Article 26?

What constituted ‘matters of religion’ so as to prohibit the Government from interfering with the Swami’s functions?

RULE:

Article 19, 25, 26, and, 27 of The Constitution Of India.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Articles 25-28: Right To Freedom Of Religion:

Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin v. State Of Bombay, 1962 AIR 853

ISSUE:

Was the Act within the legislative competence of the Legislature of the Province of Bombay?

Whether after the coming into force of the Constitution, the Act was invalid in view of Articles. 25 and 26 of the Constitution?

RULE:

Article 25 in The Constitution Of India 1949

Article 26 in The Constitution Of India 1949

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Articles 25-28: Right To Freedom Of Religion:

Seshammal v. State of Tamil Nadu (1972) 2 SCC 11


ISSUE:

Whether opening the post of Archaka to all Hindus irrespective not only of caste but also of denomination 5, could be reconciled with both the essential religious practices of the Hindu’s enshrined in the Agamas and the Constitutional provisions governing the same?

Whether while appointing an Archaka the trustee was to be bound the requirement of the Agamas of belonging to a specific religious denomination?

RULE:

Article 25 in The Constitution Of India 1949.

Article 26 in The Constitution Of India 1949.

Article 25(2)(a).

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here