Trace Your Case

Categories
Miscellaneous

Union of India v. Mohit Minerals, 2022 SCC Online SC 657

ISSUE:

Whether an Indian importer can be subject to the levy of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on the component of ocean freight paid by the foreign seller to a foreign shipping line, on a reverse charge basis?

Whether GST Council recommendations are binding on Union and States?

RULE:

The levy of IGST on the service component of the transaction violates the principle of composite supply under the CGST Act.

The four canons of taxation require clear identification of taxable event, person liable to pay, rate of tax, and value to which rate applies.

A transaction having territorial nexus with India can be taxed even if some aspects occur outside Indian territory, provided there's statutory backing.

The doctrine of cooperative federalism requires that federal units have equal legislative powers unless explicitly stated otherwise in the Constitution.

The principle against double taxation prevents levying tax twice on the same transaction when it's already included in a composite supply.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Miscellaneous

State of Assam v. B.K.Das, AIR 1973 SC 1252

ISSUE:

Whether a government servant has a right to be continued in service beyond the age of superannuation, even if they are efficient and physically fit for work?

Whether selective retention of some government servants after retirement age amounts to discrimination?

RULE:

Executive instructions, unlike statutory rules, do not confer any legal rights and cannot form the basis for legal action.

Government has discretionary power to retain or retire public servants after superannuation age based on their efficiency and public service requirements.

Retention of some efficient employees beyond retirement age while retiring others does not constitute discrimination if based on valid assessment of their performance.

However, this discretion cannot be exercised arbitrarily or in bad faith.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Miscellaneous

Mohinder Singh v. Chief Election Commissioner AIR 1978 SC 853

ISSUE:

Whether Article 329(b) of the Constitution bars all legal challenges to election-related matters before the completion of the election process?

Whether the EC's order for re-poll can be challenged in a writ petition under Article 226?

Whether the EC's powers under Article 324 are subject to principles of natural justice?

RULE:

Natural Justice: The court emphasized that decisions affecting elections must adhere to principles of natural justice, ensuring fairness and transparency in administrative actions.

Judicial Review: The court recognised the right to judicial review over decisions made by the Election Commission, particularly when such decisions could infringe on electoral rights or democratic processes.

Discretionary Power of the Election Commission: While the EC has broad powers to ensure free and fair elections, these powers must be exercised judiciously and not arbitrarily.

Accountability of Public Authorities: The ruling highlighted that public officials, including those in electoral offices, are accountable for their actions, especially when those actions affect the democratic process.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Miscellaneous

D.A.V. College, Bhatinda v. State of Punjab, AIR 1971 SC 1731

ISSUE:

Whether Hindus can be considered a minority community in the State of Punjab for the purposes of Article 30(1) of the Indian Constitution?

RULE:

Fundamental Rights of Minorities: The Court emphasized the rights of religious and linguistic minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. This includes the right to choose the medium of instruction and script, which is guaranteed under Articles 29(1) and 30(1) of the Constitution.

Legislative Competence: The principle that no State has the legislative power to prescribe a particular medium of instruction for higher education that infringes upon the Parliament's authority under Item 66 of List I, which relates to coordinating and determining standards in such institutions.

Harmonious Construction: The Court utilized the doctrine of harmonious construction to reconcile conflicting legislative powers between State and Union laws, asserting that Union legislation prevails when there is an overlap regarding educational matters.

Non-Infringement of Rights: The Court held that the State must harmonize its powers to prescribe the medium of instruction with the rights of minorities, ensuring that they are not compelled to adopt a medium or script that does not reflect their cultural and linguistic identity.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Constitutional Law

ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, (1976) 2 SCC 521

ISSUE:

Whether the ordinance issued by the President on June 27, 1975, was unconstitutional?

Whether a writ petition of Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution is maintainable for enforcing Article 21 during a national emergency proclaimed under Article 359(1) of the Constitution?

Whether there was any scope for judicial review during an emergency?

RULE:

Presidential Supremacy during Emergency - During a declared Emergency, Presidential orders have ultimate authority over fundamental rights and executive actions cannot be challenged in courts, even if they are arbitrary.

Doctrine of Eclipse - The fundamental rights are not permanently extinguished but temporarily suspended or 'eclipsed' during the Emergency period and automatically revive once Emergency is lifted.

Parliamentary Sovereignty - Parliament has supreme power to modify or suspend fundamental rights during Emergency, and courts must defer to legislative wisdom during such times.

Doctrine of Basic Rights (from Justice Khanna's dissent) - Certain fundamental rights exist independent of the Constitution and cannot be suspended even during Emergency, as rule of law must prevail over arbitrary state action.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Political Representation and Decentralisation

Dr. K. Krishnamurthy v. Union of India, (2010) 7 SCC 202.

ISSUE:

Whether reserving seats in favor of backward classes for the purpose of occupying seats and chairperson positions in panchayats and municipalities constitutionally valid?

RULE:

Actions by the Union of India must adhere to principles of the Constitution, particularly fundamental rights.

Constitutional rights of individuals must be respected and protected by government actions.

Governmental authorities are bound by the provisions of the Constitution and cannot infringe upon fundamental rights arbitrarily.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Asymmetric Federalism

Edwingson Bareh v. State of Assam & Ors. AIR 1965 SC 265

ISSUE:

Whether the notification issued by the Governor of Assam establishing the Jowai District as an autonomous district is constitutionally valid?

Whether the creation of autonomous districts like the Jowai District aligns with the principles of asymmetric federalism in India?

Whether the delineation of powers and functions between the District Councils and Regional Councils within the autonomous district complies with the federal structure of India?

RULE:

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Legislative Competence

Gujarat University v. Krishna Ranganath Mudholkar (AIR 1963 SC 703)

ISSUE:

Whether the Gujarat university had the right to mandate Gujarati and/or Hindi as the only medium of instruction and exams in affiliated colleges under the Gujarat University Act, 1949?

Whether the legislation was constitutionally valid in view of Entry 66 of List I of the Seventh Schedule?

RULE:

The Gujarat University Act of 1949 does not authorize the mandate of Gujarati or Hindi as exclusive mediums of instruction or examination.

The Act's provisions do not support the imposition of specific languages as sole mediums, indicating a lack of authority for such mandates.

State government regulations regarding education, governed by Entry 11 of List II, are subordinate to Parliament's authority under Entry 66 of List I, especially concerning higher education matters.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Article 14, 15 and 16 - The Right To Equality:

Hira Nath v. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1973 SC 1260)

ISSUE:

Whether the imposition of punitive taxes on agricultural land without corresponding benefits violates Article 14 (equality before law) of the Indian Constitution?

RULE:

Article 14 of the Indian Constitution guarantees equality before the law, however, the government can classify citizens for taxation purposes, but the classification must be reasonable and based on intelligible differences.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Legislative Competence

K.C. Gajapathi Narayan Deo v. State of Orissa, AIR 1953 SC 375

ISSUE:

Whether the Orissa State Estates Abolition Act, 1952 is a piece of colourable legislation?

Whether the Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1952, is Constitutionally Valid?

RULE:

The doctrine of colourable legislation does not involve any question of bona fides or mala fides on the part of the legislature. The whole doctrine resolves itself into the question of the competency of a particular legislature to enact a particular law. If the legislature is competent to pass a particular law, the motives that impelled it to act are really irrelevant.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here