Trace Your Case

Categories
ITC

Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. v. Chief Commissioner, GST, Civil Appeal No. 2948 of 2023

ISSUE:

Whether a shopping mall or similar leased property can qualify as "plant" under Section 17(5)(d), allowing ITC on its construction costs if it is essential to generating taxable supplies?

Whether denying ITC for leased commercial property contradicts the GST system’s goal of minimizing cascading taxes and ensuring tax neutrality?

Whether Section 17(5)(d) infringes upon Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution by creating arbitrary distinctions among taxpayers and restricting their right to carry on business?

RULE:

Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act restricts Input Tax Credit (ITC) on construction-related expenses for immovable property, even if that property is used for generating taxable supplies, such as rental income.

The restriction reflects legislative intent to prevent ITC misuse, particularly where properties are created for self-use and not further taxable supply.

The “functionality test” is a key criterion: properties integral to business operations (e.g., "plant" that directly supports taxable supply) may be eligible for ITC under Section 17(5)(d).

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Supply

Re: Maharashtra Power Generation Ltd (MAH/AAAR/SS-RJ/09/2018-19)

ISSUE:

Whether GST is applicable on liquidated damages imposed due to delays in contract performance?

Whether liquidated damages constitute an independent supply or an adjustment to the contract price?

Whether the time of supply for GST purposes arises upon the occurrence or establishment of delay?

Whether liquidated damages qualify for input tax credit by the contractor?

RULE:

Liquidated damages payable due to delays in contractual performance are considered a taxable supply under the GST Act when they constitute an agreement to "tolerate an act" or a situation.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
GST

Union of India v. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd.  AIR 2022 SC 2826.

ISSUE:

Whether the Indian importer under a CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) contract, who does not directly pay for ocean freight, can be considered the "recipient" of freight services and thus liable for IGST on a reverse charge basis.

Whether the imposition of IGST on ocean freight through Notifications Nos. 8/2017 and 10/2017 constitute double taxation, as freight costs are already included in the customs duty valuation on the CIF value.

Whether the notifications exceed the statutory scope of the IGST and CGST Acts by taxing services provided entirely outside Indian territorial jurisdiction, between foreign entities.

RULE:

Under Section 5(3) of the IGST Act, tax on a reverse charge basis can only be levied on the recipient of a supply of goods or services.

Section 2(93) of the CGST Act defines the "recipient" as the party liable to pay consideration for the service, which, in CIF contracts, is typically the foreign seller, not the Indian importer.

The Constitution of India mandates that taxation must have a clear territorial nexus with India; therefore, transactions entirely between foreign entities cannot be taxed under IGST.

Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act includes freight costs in the customs duty valuation, implying that IGST on the same freight component would result in double taxation.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Supply

In re Integrated Decisions And Systems India Pvt Ltd (GST-ARA- 116/2019-20/B-113)

ISSUE:

Whether the partial amount recovered from the employees for facilitating transport would be construed as a supply of service by the Applicant?

If such service is construed as supply, then how will the value of said supply be determined keeping in mind that employee and the Applicant are related parties as per GST law?

RULE:

The facilities provided to their employees that are not integrally connected to the functioning of the business cannot be construed as a supply.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
ITC

In re New Pandian Travels Private Limited (TN/43/ARA/2021)

ISSUE:

Whether the GST paid on the Motor cars of seating capacity not exceeding 13 (including Driver) leased or rented to customers will be available to it as input tax credit in terms of Section 17(5) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017?

Whether the GST paid on the Motor cars of seating capacity not exceeding 13 (including Driver) registered as public vehicles with RTO to transport passengers provided to their different customers on lease or rental or hire will be available to it as input tax credit in terms of section 17(5) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017?

Whether the supply of services by way of renting or, leasing, or hiring motor vehicles to Special Economic Zones (SEZ) to transport the employees of the customers without payment of IGST is deemed as a taxable supply and whether ITC is admissible on motor vehicles procured and used commonly for such supply to SEZ and other than SEZ supply?

RULE:

Only when the taxable person makes a further supply of such motor vehicles with a seating capacity of less than thirteen can he claim the input tax credit.

If the person or entity is a service provider who provides service for renting/leasing motor vehicles, the taxable outward supply should include the further supply of such purchased motor vehicles to be eligible for the input tax credit.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
ITC

Re: Biostadt India Ltd (NO.GST-ARA- 72/2018-19/B- 165)

ISSUE:

Whether input tax credit can be claimed by the applicant on procurement of gold coins, which are to be distributed to the customers at the end of the scheme period for achieving stipulated lifting or payment criteria?

Whether input tax credit can be claimed by parties that notify other schemes with similar conditions?

RULE:

Input tax credit is not available for gifts or rewards without consideration even though they were given for sales promotion as they do not qualify as inputs for the purpose of credit since no GST is paid on its disposal.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
ITC

Re: M/s. National Aluminium Company Limited (Order No. 02-03/Odisha AAAR/2018-2019)

ISSUE:

Whether the GST paid on services used by a party for maintenance of their township, security services and horticulture can be claimed as input tax credit?

RULE:

To claim input tax credit, an input service must be integrally connected with the business of manufacturing the final product. The cost of an input service forming part of the cost of the final product alone cannot be a condition to allow the benefit of an input tax credit.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Judicially Noticeable Fact

Onkar Nath & Ors. v. The Delhi Administration AIR 1977 SC 1108

ISSUE:

Whether the lower courts were justified in considering specific facts without needing formal evidence?

RULE:

Under Section 57 of the Evidence Act, courts can take judicial notice of widely known facts without requiring formal proof.

This allows the judicial system to recognize and rely on facts of public knowledge—such as notable events—without evidence, thereby ensuring efficiency and preventing undue formalism in the judicial process.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
General Rules of Interpretation

M.V. Joshi v. M.U. Shimpi, AIR 1961 SC 1494

ISSUE:

Whether the butter prepared from curd comes under the definition of “butter” in the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955?

Whether selling butter below the prescribed standard, even when no foreign articles are added, amounts to adulteration?

RULE:

In the Indian Act, selling butter below the prescribed standard is deemed to be adulteration.

A dealer in such butter cannot adduce evidence to prove that notwithstanding the deficiency in the standard, it is not adulterated.

The butter which is prepared from curd is legally considered butter, and deviations from the prescribed purity standards in food constitute adulteration under strict liability.

Broad interpretation of the food safety laws to protect public health, with legislative amendments clarifying the statutory definitions retrospectively aiding in interpreting the legislative intent.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
General Rules of Interpretation

Maradana Mosque v. Badiuddin Mahmud and Anr. [1967] 1 A.C. 13

ISSUE:

Whether the Minister in making the first Order was acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity and was under a duty to observe the rules of natural justice?

Whether the Minister acted in excess of his jurisdiction, in that he failed to consider the right questions and failed to make the decisions which were the requisite foundations for an Order under section 11?

Whether there was an error of law on the face of the record?

RULE:

An order cannot be passed without giving a fair opportunity of being heard to the person or entity against whom such order is passed.

The rules of natural justice must be followed in every case.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here