Trace Your Case

Categories
GUARANTEE

Bank of Bihar v. Damodar Prasad, (1969) 1 SCR 620

ISSUE:

Whether the plaintiff can recover the amount from the guarantor or does he have to wait till he has exhausted his remedies against the defendant?

RULE:

It is the duty of the surety to pay the decretal amount. On such payment he will be subrogated to the rights of the creditor under s. 140 of the Indian Contract Act and he may then recover the amount from the principal.

Subscribe to Read More.
Login Join Now
Categories
GUARANTEE

Anirudhan v. Thomco’s Bank, AIR 1963 SC 746

ISSUE:

Whether a document jointly executed by two person creating a liability equal for both is to be regarded as materially altered if the liability is reduced equally for both but the alteration is made only by one of them?

RULE:

At the stage when the alterations were made, the principal debtor had been acting for and on behalf of the appellant as the appellant had been standing surety for him. The plea of avoidance of contract by material alteration was of no avail to the appellant because the document was not altered while in possession of the promisee but was altered by the principal debtor who was at the time acting as the agent of the appellant.

Subscribe to Read More.
Login Join Now