Trace Your Case

Categories
Restitution of Conjugal Rights under Personal Law

T. Sareetha v. T.Venkata Subbaih AIR 1983 AP 356

ISSUE:

Whether Cuddapah or Madras should be counted as the place where the “parties had last resided together” for the purpose of Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?

Is Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act liable to be struck down as violative of the fundamental rights, more particularly articles 14, 19 and 21 inasmuch as the statutory relief of restitution of conjugal rights offends the guarantee to life, personal liberty and human dignity and decency?

RULE:

By treating the wife and the husband who are inherently unequal as equals, section 9 of the Act offends the rule of equal protection of laws. For that reason the formal equality that section 9 of the Act ensures cannot be accepted as constitutional. Section 9 promotes no legitimate public purpose or is based on any conception of the general good. Section 9 should therefore be held to be arbitrary and void as offending Article 14 of the Constitution.”

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Restitution of Conjugal Rights under Personal Law

Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh AIR 1984 Del 66

ISSUE:

Is the provision of restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act constitutionally valid?

RULE:

Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 defines the Restitution of Conjugal Rights as: When either the husband or the wife has, without reasonable excuse, withdrawn from the society of the other, the aggrieved party may apply, by petition to the district court, for restitution of conjugal rights and the court, on being satisfied of the truth of the statements made in such petition and that there is no legal ground why the application should not be granted, may decree restitution of conjugal rights accordingly.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Christian Marriage and Divorce Laws, SMA, and FMA

Lakshmi Sanyal v. Sachit Kumar Dhar, AIR 1972 SC 2667

ISSUE:

Whether the marriage is null and void due to the fact that the consent of the minor/her guardian was not obtained?

Whether the marriage is null and void on account that the parties are within prohibited degrees of one another, even though dispensation was granted for the same?

RULE:

Sections 5 and 19 of the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872

Section 19 of the Indian Divorce Act

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Christian Marriage and Divorce Laws, SMA, and FMA

Leelamma v. Dilip Kumar, AIR 1993 Ker 57

ISSUE:

Whether their marriage can be declared null on the grounds of fraud?

Was the husband Christian at the time of their marriage?

What is the position of the suit for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the husband?

RULE:

In absence of any statutory law, the canon law applies to the members of the Syrian catholic community.

According to the Canon laws, a person who professes the Christian faith is a Christian.

According to canon law, a marriage is invalid if
there is an error concerning the quality of the person.

Canon 74(1) states: "Error concerning the person, renders the marriage invalid".

Canon 821 states: "A person invalidly celebrates marriage who is deceived by fraud perpetrated to obtain consent, concerning some quality of the other party, which by its very nature can seriously disturb the partnership of conjugal life."

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Christian Marriage and Divorce Laws, SMA, and FMA

Sujatha v. Jose Augustine (1994) II DMC 442

ISSUE:

Whether the marriage is null and void on the ground that the consent of the wife was obtained by fraud, force, and coercion?

Whether the marriage between the petitioner and first respondent alleged to have conducted after an attempted conversion of religion by undergoing the ceremony of baptism was in accordance with the law regulating marriages among the Latin Catholic Community?

RULE:

The mere fact that one has undergone the ceremony of baptism may not by itself be sufficient to hold that one has become a Christian. The fundamental thing to be established before one can be held to be Christian is that the person concerned truly believes in and professes the Christian faith.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Muslim Marriage: Essentials and Validity

Abdul Kadir v. Salima, (1886) ILR 8 All 149

ISSUE:

What is the nature of Muslim marriage?

Whether the suit for restitution of conjugal rights is maintainable before payment of dower?

RULE:

Section 2 of The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 states that, a ‘Dower’ is defined as a sum of money or property promised to be paid or delivered by the husband to the wife, as a consideration of the marriage.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Muslim Marriage: Essentials and Validity

Mohd. Nihal v. State, W.P. (CRL.) 591/2008 

ISSUE:

Whether or not any act other than personal law has the effect of rendering void the marriage of a Muslim girl who has attained puberty but is below the age of 18?

Whether a person other than the father or the prescribed relations in the Shariat Law acts as a Wali in a Muslim marriage or not?

Whether or not Mohad. Niha should get the custody of her wife Mst. Afsana?

RULE:

Section 2 and 3 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.

Section 2 of Muslim Personal Law (Shariat Act)

Section 11 of the Indian contract Act, 1872.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Muslim Marriage: Essentials and Validity

Tara Bano v. Iqbal Mohd, Second Appeal No. 434/2007

ISSUE:

When the option of puberty is opted by a lady by her conduct and same is admitted by the opposite party, in that situation, whether it is necessary to obtain a decree for dissolution of marriage from a competent court?

Whether in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the suit for restitution of conjugal rights is maintainable?

When the plaintiff himself admits that the present appellant has entered into a second marriage, then the decree for restitution of conjugal rights is justified or not?

Whether the decree of restitution of conjugal rights can be executed when both the parties have remarried?

RULE:

Relevant sections of Mohammadan law:

Section 272 states that, When a minor has been contracted in marriage by the father or father's father, the contract of marriage is valid and binding, and it cannot be annulled by the minor on attaining puberty.

1. Section 273 states that By the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, all restriction on the option of puberty in the case of a minor girl whose marriage has been arranged by a father or grandfather has been abolished and under Section 2(vii) of the Act, a wife is entitled to the dissolution of her marriage if she proves the following facts, namely, (1) the marriage has not been consummated, (2) the marriage took place before she attained the age of 15 years and (3) she has repudiated the marriage before attaining the age of 18 years.”

2. Section 275 states that The mere exercise of the option of repudiation does not operate as a dissolution of marriage. The repudiation must be confirmed by the Court. Until then the marriage subsists, and if either party to the marriage dies, the other will inherit from him or her, as the case may be.”

Section 2 of The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 states that A woman married under Muslim law shall be entitled to obtain a decree for the dissolution of her marriage on any one or more of the following grounds, namely: (vii) that she having been given in marriage by her father or another guardian before she attained the age of fifteen years, repudiated the marriage before attaining the age of eighteen years; Provided that the marriage has not been consummated.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Muslim Marriage: Essentials and Validity

Khursheed Ahmad Khan v. State of U.P., SC, Civil Appeal No.1662 Of 2015

ISSUE:

Whether the order of removing the appellant from service for proved misconduct of contracting another marriage during the existence of the first marriage without the permission of the Government is valid or does the Conduct Rules ultra vires Article 25 of the Indian Constitution?

RULE:

Article 25 of the Indian Constitution.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here