ISSUE:
Whether the covenants of this agreement are unreasonable or not, and whether whole agreement is unenforceable or not?
Whether the injunction claimed by the defendants should be granted or not?
RULE:
It is therefore futile to contend that the existence of a negative covenant in a service agreement makes the agreement void on the ground that it is in restraint of trade and against the principles found in Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act.
In truth a man who works for a particular wage and for a certain period agrees to work in fact and such an agreement does not restrain him from doing so.