Whether the appellant, Shri S.K. Maini, is classified as a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, given his given his administrative, managerial, and clerical duties?
Whether the Labour Court and the High Court erred in the fairness of the domestic enquiry against Maini, particularly considering the Enquiring Officer's role and Maini's denial of legal representation?
The nature of an employee's primary duties determines their classification as a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act. Job designation alone is insufficient; actual functions take precedence.