When a party objects to the enforceability of an arbitration agreement, does Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 require a prima facie finding or a final judgment on its validity?
Whether the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 aims to reduce judicial intervention in the arbitral procedure and accelerate dispute settlement by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration?
The key problem is the interpretation of Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which focuses on the type of adjudication required when a party claims that the arbitration agreement is "null and void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed." The rule requires the judicial authority to evaluate whether a prima facie decision or a final ruling on the objection should be issued.