How to ensure that, particularly in cases of divorcing spouses and in single-man companies, company law could not be used as a tool to conceal assets or avoid liability in relation to those assets, whilst maintaining the integrity of the Salomon principle?
Whether the court could pierce the corporate veil?
Piercing of corporate veil cases should be true exceptions to the case of Salomon v. Salomon such that where a person who owns and controls a company is said in certain circumstances to be identified with it in law by virtue of that ownership and control.