Whether the Minister in making the first Order was acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity and was under a duty to observe the rules of natural justice?
Whether the Minister acted in excess of his jurisdiction, in that he failed to consider the right questions and failed to make the decisions which were the requisite foundations for an Order under section 11?
Whether there was an error of law on the face of the record?
An order cannot be passed without giving a fair opportunity of being heard to the person or entity against whom such order is passed.
The rules of natural justice must be followed in every case.