Whether the statement made by the accused was admissible in evidence by virtue of Section 27 of the Evidence Act?
Whether the presumption arising under illustration (a) to s. 114 of the Evidence Act valid?
For the applicability of Section 27 of the Evidence Act, two conditions are pre-requisite, viz:
Information must be such as has caused discovery of the fact, and
The information must "relate distinctly" to the fact discovered."