Trace Your Case

Categories
DRM

Columbia Sportswear Company v DIT, Bangalore (Special Leave Petition (C) No. 31543 of 2011)

ISSUE:

Whether a ruling of AAR can directly be challenged before the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution or it has to be first challenged before the High Court under Articles 226 and/or 227 of the Constitution.

RULE:

The Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) is a tribunal under Articles 136 and 227 of the Constitution of India. This means that its rulings can be challenged directly in the Supreme Court or in the High Court, respectively.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
DRM

L S Cables Ltd. v. Director of Income-tax, A.A.R. No. 858-861 of 2009

ISSUE:

Whether the assessee was liable to pay tax in India on its offshore supply income.

Whether the assessee had a permanent establishment in India for the purpose of taxation.

RULE:

A foreign company is not liable to pay tax in India on its offshore supply income unless it has a permanent establishment in India.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here