Trace Your Case

Categories
Appointment and Challenge

Sanjiv Prakash v. Seema Kukreja and Ors., 2021 SCC Online SC 282

ISSUE:

Whether an agreement which contains an arbitration clause has or has not been novated be decided in the exercise of a limited prima facie review as to whether an arbitration agreement exists between the parties.

RULE:

The existence of an arbitration agreement presupposes a valid agreement which the Court would enforce by relegating the parties to the arbitration.

The existence of an arbitration agreement means an arbitration agreement that meets and satisfies the statutory requirements of both the Arbitration Act and the Contract Act and when it is enforceable in law.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Applicable Laws

PASL Wind Solutions Private Limited v. GE Power Conversion India Private Limited (2021) 7 SCC 1

ISSUE:

Whether two companies incorporated in India choose a forum for arbitration outside India?

Whether an award made at such a forum outside India can be enforceable?

RULE:

Part II of the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the “Arbitration Act”) applies to the enforcement of foreign awards in India

There are four criteria for an award to be considered a foreign award: (i) the dispute must be considered to be a commercial dispute under the law in force in India, (ii) it must be made under a written arbitration agreement, (iii) the dispute must arise between “persons” (without regard to their nationality, residence, or domicile), and (iv) the arbitration must be conducted in a New York Convention country.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Arbitrability

Nori Holdings Limited et al v. PJSC Bank Okritie Financial Corporation, [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm)

ISSUE:

Whether the court of one EU Member State can grant an anti-suit injunction where one of the parties has started legal proceedings in another EU Member State in disregard of an existing arbitration agreement between the parties?

RULE:

The Brussels Regulation was adopted by the European Union in 2000 in order to minimize the impact of differences between national rules governing jurisdiction.

An injunction to stop legal action launched in violation of an arbitration agreement in another Member State court cannot be granted by an English court.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Appointment and Challenge

National Highways Authority of India v. Sayedabad Tea Company, 2019 SCC ONLINE SC 1102

ISSUE:

Whether or not Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 stands forfeited when the central Government exercised its right, which is bestowed by Section 3G (5) of the National Highway Act 1956 Act, to appoint an Arbitrator?

RULE:

Being a special enactment, the National Highway Act of 1956 is a code in and of itself that lays out the acquisition process as well as the method used to determine compensation by the competent authority. Anyone who feels that the compensation set under subsections (1) or (2) of Section 3G of the Act of 1956 is unfair can certainly move to appoint an arbitrator, who the Central Government is required to name under Section 3G(5) of the Act of 1956.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Non Signatories

MTNL v. Canara Bank (2020) 12 SCC 767

ISSUE:

Whether there exists a valid arbitration agreement between the three parties, i.e., MTNL, Canara Bank, and CanFina?

RULE:

Groups of Companies Doctrine: The doctrine has been invoked by courts and tribunals for joining a non-signatory member of the group if the facts of the case determine that it was the mutual intention of all parties for binding the signatories as well as the non-signatories affiliates in the group.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Parties and Arbitration Agreements

Kababji Sal v. Kout Food Group [2021] UKSC 48

ISSUE:

Whether the validity of the arbitration agreement was governed by any law?

Whether there was any possibility that a court might find that KFG became a party to the arbitration agreement in the franchise agreements if governed by English Law?

Whether the Court of Appeal was justified in its summary judgement?

RULE:

The Validation Principle, an established technique of contractual interpretations, states that when there is a question or ambiguity in a contract, the law assumes that the law which upholds the validity and forms the base of the contract will prevail.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Parties and Arbitration Agreements

Indowind Energy Ltd. v. Wescare (India) Ltd. AIR 2010 SC 1793

ISSUE:

Whether an arbitration clause between two parties be considered as a binding arbitration agreement on a person who is not a signatory to it?

RULE:

Parties to the Agreement: By interpreting the definition mentioned in Section 2(h) of the Act with Section 7 and considering the facts of the case as well held that there was no acknowledgment on the part of the third party that they are willing to or not bound by the agreement, neither by the company nor by any other board of directors of the company.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Appointment and Challenge

Indian Oil Corporation v Raja Transport, (2009) 8 SCC 520

ISSUE:

Whether appointing the Indian Oil Corporation's Director as Arbitrator would take away the independence and impartiality of the arbitral tribunal?

RULE:

Government contract arbitration clauses stating that an employee of the Department (often a high official unrelated to the work or the contract) will serve as the Arbitrator are valid and enforceable.

While the appointment of an employee as an arbitrator is not ipso facto a ground to raise a presumption of bias.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Applicable Laws

Indus Mobile Distribution v. Datawind Innovation Pvt. Ltd. (2017) 7 SCC 678.

ISSUE:

Whether a clause in the arbitration agreement specifying exclusive jurisdiction be nullified?

RULE:

If the arbitration agreement between the parties contains an exclusive jurisdiction clause that specifies a certain location as having jurisdiction over all issues related to the arbitration agreement, that provision by itself would nullify the jurisdiction of any other court in that matter.

Even if the entire cause of action does not occur at the location given exclusive jurisdiction, this will still be affirmed.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here