Trace Your Case

Categories
Forest and Wildlife

T.N.Godavarman Thirumulkpad v. Union of India AIR 1997 SC 1228

ISSUE:

Whether the meaning of "forest" under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 should be understood in its dictionary sense, covering all forests, irrespective of ownership and classification?

Whether prior approval of the Central Government is required under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 for any non-forest activity, including mining and timber operations, within a forest area?

Whether State Governments can independently permit activities in forest areas without adhering to the requirements of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980?

RULE:

The Forest Conservation Act, 1980 was enacted to prevent further deforestation and ecological imbalance. The term "forest" must be interpreted broadly to fulfill this purpose, encompassing all statutorily recognized forests as well as areas recorded as forests in government records, regardless of ownership. A restrictive interpretation would defeat the legislative intent.

The requirement of prior approval under Section 2 of the Act is absolute and non-negotiable. Any non-forest activity within a forest area, including sawmills, veneer mills, plywood mills, and mining, is impermissible without explicit approval from the Central Government. The nature of ownership or classification of land does not affect this requirement.

State Governments have no discretion to permit the use of forest land for non-forest purposes. The power to approve such activities rests solely with the Central Government to ensure uniformity in forest conservation efforts across the country. Any permission granted by a State Government without Central approval is void and contrary to law.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Statutory Regimes

Stella Silks v. State of Karnataka ; AIR 2001 KANT 219

ISSUE:

Whether the Court should intervene with the order passed by the Board under Section 33-A directing the closure of the petitioner's industry?

RULE:

Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 – Sec. 33-A, Where there were violations of various provisions of the Act and conditions imposed there by the industry for its benefit. It also flouted orders of the Court and violated its own undertakings given before the Court. Industry being run without enabling power or order in its favour polluting the environment by discharging contaminated water, the order for closure of industry was not liable to be interfered with.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Forest and Wildlife

Orrisa Mining Corporation v. Ministry of Environment and Forests [2013] 6 S.C.R. 881 –

ISSUE:

Whether the decision to reject environmental clearance for the construction of a mine because of its impact on indigenous tribes is lawful.

RULE:

Agriculture was the only source of livelihood for the tribes concerned, apart from the collection and sale of minor forest produce to supplement their income. The tribes had great emotional attachments to their lands. The United Nations Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples notes that tribal forest dwellers have a right to maintain their distinctive spiritual relationship with their traditionally owned or otherwise occupied and used lands.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
NGT

Prafulla Samantra and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. (POSCO Case)

ISSUE:

Whether the Appeal has been filed within the period of limitation in so far as challenging the ECs granted in May/June, 2007 and whether appeals can be entertained to that extent.

Whether the Public Hearing was properly conducted following the prescribed procedure applicable at the relevant point in time and whether the same is valid.

Whether the MoEF was right in accepting the review report submitted by Ms. Meena Gupta who participated in the issue of grant of original ECs since she was the Secretary to the Government of India, MoEF and whether the Government was right in rejecting the majority report of the review committee. And whether the apprehensions/issues raised by the Review Committee are properly addressed while issuance of the final order under challenge?

RULE:

It is essential to ensure that the government follows the legal procedures and safeguards while granting environmental clearances. we have kept in mind the need for industrial development, employment opportunities created by such projects that involve huge foreign investment, but at the same time we are conscious that any development should be within the parameters of environmental and ecological concerns and satisfying the principles of sustainable development and precautionary measures.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Statutory Regimes

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, (2000) 10 SCC 664

ISSUE:

Whether clearance granted by the Union of India was given without proper study and consideration of environmental impact?

Whether the conditions imposed by the Ministry of Environment and Forests were complied with?

RULE:

Montesquieu’s Doctrine of Separation of Power states that a suitable form of society cannot exist without the separation of the three organs of the Government, namely, the executive, judiciary and legislature. The three organs must also be separated from one another with precision.

The ‘Precautionary Principle’, widely used in determining the outcome, states that where there is a threat to irreversible or serious damage to the environment, there must be immediate action, and a lack of scientific assurance should not and cannot be a reason to avoid taking action.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Statutory Regimes

M.P. Patil v. Union of India, 2013 SCC OnLine NGT 1227

ISSUE:

Whether the process followed by the Ministry of Environment and Forests and concerned authorities was fair to the locals and in compliance with the due process of law?

RULE:

The ‘Precautionary Principle’, widely used in determining the outcome, states that where there is a threat to irreversible or serious damage to the environment, there must be immediate action, and a lack of scientific assurance should not and cannot be a reason to avoid taking action.

The doctrine of Sustainable development involves balancing the various aspects of social progress, economic growth, and the environment. This concept recognizes that these three elements are interconnected and that their integration into any strategy is crucial. The doctrine of sustainability seeks to meet the present necessities and take into account the needs of the future. The concept of sustainable development requires a long-term commitment to ensure the protection of the environment and social equity. All stakeholder groups, including governments and businesses, should work together to promote policies and practices that are sustainable.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Statutory Regimes

M/s Delhi Bottling Co. Pvt. Ltd. v Central Board for the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, AIR 1986 Del. 152

ISSUE:

Whether the impugned order passed by the Magistrate was correct or not?

RULE:

Section 21 of the Water Act provides that the State Pollution Control Board or any officer authorised by the State Pollution Control Board shall have the power to take samples of water from any stream or well or samples of any sewage or trade effluent for the purpose of analysis. Section 21 further lays down strict compliance with procedure, and if the same procedure is not followed, then it will not be permissible as evidence in the court.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Forest and Wildlife

Indian Handicrafts Emporium v Union of India, AIR 2003 SC 3240

ISSUE:

Whether the impugned provisions of the act in question are violative of Article 19 (1) (g), where the right of appellants to practice their profession of ivory trade was being curbed,

Whether this prohibition on traders was unreasonable and arbitrary under Article 14 of the Constitution?

RULE:

Trade in imported ivory, which is dangerous to ecology, has been regulated by imposing total prohibition under the Wildlife (Protection) Amending Act of 1991. Such an Amending Act indirectly seeks to protect Indian elephants and to arrest their further depletion.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Introduction and Principles of Environmental Protection Statutory Regimes

A.P. Pollution Control Board v. Prof. M.V. Nayudu, (1999) 2 SCC 718

ISSUE:

Whether the AP Pollution Control Board was justified in rejecting the respondent company’s application for consent on environmental grounds?

Whether the appellate authority under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, erred in reversing the APPCB’s decision despite environmental concerns?

Whether the Government of Andhra Pradesh’s exemption of the respondent company from the 10 km restriction under G.O. Ms. No. 111 was legally sustainable?

RULE:

The precautionary principle requires that where environmental harm is possible, lack of full scientific certainty cannot be a reason to allow the activity. The burden of proof is on the industry to demonstrate that no environmental damage will occur.

Judicial and technical expertise must be integrated in environmental adjudication to ensure informed decision-making. Scientific complexity necessitates an adjudicatory framework that includes environmental experts.

Government exemptions from environmental regulations must not undermine statutory objectives. Such exemptions cannot compromise public health, ecological balance, or the regulatory framework designed to prevent environmental harm.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here
Categories
Statutory Regimes

Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v. Union of India, (2019) 15 SCC 401 Goa Airport case I

ISSUE:

Whether the decision-making process and the ultimate decision made by the Union Ministry of Environment of granting the EC was valid and enforceable?

RULE:

The Doctrine of Ecological Proportionality suggests a balance between the protection of the environment and the interests of exploitation by the human race. The Precautionary Principle also arose from the concept of preserving or maintaining a balance between industrial and urban needs and environmental protection.

The principle of intergenerational equity aims to create fairness among present and future generations in the preservation and conservation of natural resources.

Subscribe to Read More.
Join Now
Already a member? Log in here