Whether electronic records, such as CDs submitted by the appellant, can be admitted as evidence without compliance with Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
Whether the evidence presented by the appellant met the standard of proof required to establish corrupt practices akin to a criminal charge?
Compliance with Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act of 1872 is mandatory for the admissibility of electronic records.
Secondary electronic evidence must be accompanied by a certificate under Section 65B(4) certifying its authenticity; otherwise, it is inadmissible.
Allegations of corrupt practices under the Representation of the People Act must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, akin to the standard required for criminal charges.