ISSUE:
Whether it is permissible for a court to rely on the findings of a subsequent award in resolving objections brought against a previous award in a case involving several awards and arbitration proceedings, whether it is permissible for a court to rely on the findings of a subsequent award in resolving objections brought against a previous award.
Whether the 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act have explicit provisions or established legal principles to handle the issue of multiple arbitral processes and promote effective dispute resolution?
Whether the Act contains instructions or procedures for dealing with the problem of varied arbitral processes and ensuring that dispute resolution adheres to the terms of the 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
RULE:
To avoid multiple arbitrations, parties interested in arbitration pertaining to the same contract should combine their claims into a single arbitration procedure if practicable. This ensures that dispute resolution is more efficient and effective.